Procedure

Continuous Quality Improvement Procedure

Refuge House, Inc.
Last updated: July 24, 2026 · Source: policies-procedures/Procedure/Continuous Quality Improvement Procedure.md

REFUGE HOUSE, INC.

Procedure Information Details
PROCEDURE NAME Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI/PQI) Procedure
PROCEDURE NUMBER FC-CQI-01.1
RELATED POLICY FC-CQI-01 Continuous Quality Improvement Policy
APPROVED BY Executive Director
EFFECTIVE DATE 6/16/26
REVISION DATE 6/16/26
LAST UPDATED 5/15/2026
LAST APPROVED 5/22/2026
APPLICABLE T3C PACKAGES: APPLICABLE T3C ADD-ON SERVICES:
☒ T3C Basic Foster Family Home ☒ Transition Support Services for Youth & Young Adults
☒ Substance Use Support Services ☒ Kinship Caregiver Support Services
☒ Short-Term Assessment ☒ Pregnant & Parenting Youth or Young Adult
☒ Mental & Behavioral Health
☒ Sexual Aggression/Sex Offender
☒ Complex Medical Needs or Medically Fragile
☒ Human Trafficking Victim/Survivor
☒ Intellectual or Developmental Disability (IDD)/Autism Spectrum Disorder
☒ T3C Treatment Foster Family Care

PURPOSE:

To operationalize FC-CQI-01 by specifying how Refuge House runs its CQI/PQI cycle — outcome measurement, the client and stakeholder satisfaction program, incident/trend (PQI) review, internal audits and corrective action, and reporting. This procedure leans on activities already established elsewhere and cross-references them rather than duplicating their detail.

RESPONSIBILITY:

PROCEDURE:

1. Logic Models, Outcome Measurement & Data Collection

Refuge House uses its existing per-package Logic Models and CQI Models (Basic, MBH, IDD/Autism, STASS, SU, TFFC — cookbook/previewforms; data/placement-datasheets.json; master CQI Plan / Logic-Model Integration). This procedure runs the cycle against those models; it does not recreate them. Each Logic Model's CQI Process block (Data Collection · Program Review · Implementation Adjustments) governs the activities below per TAC §749.665.

Who How When Where Reference
CQI Coordinator Data Collection: monthly child-level outcomes, quarterly foster-home analysis, CANS 3.0 utilization, and documentation-quality reviews against each package's Logic Model outcome measures (safety, permanency, well-being); track placement stability and disruption patterns Monthly / quarterly Radius / quality dashboard TAC §749.665; per-package Logic Models; FC6-01
CQI Coordinator / Program Director Program Review: 30–60-day Service Plan reviews, continued-stay criteria, TBRI® fidelity monitoring, and the quarterly Logic Model review Per cadence; Logic Model review quarterly Radius / dashboards TAC §749.665; T3C Blueprint
CQI Coordinator Implementation Adjustments: service-delivery refinement, training enhancements, resource reallocation, and annual Logic Model updates As indicated; Logic Models annually Quality dashboard / Logic Models TAC §749.665

2. Client & Stakeholder Satisfaction Program

This is the agency's formal client-satisfaction program. It consolidates the satisfaction tools already in use and adds a defined cadence.

Who How When Where Reference
CQI Coordinator Administer a caregiver (foster/kinship/adoptive) satisfaction survey measuring support, training, communication, and overall satisfaction (consolidates the R&R retention "family satisfaction" analysis and the Kinship caregiver satisfaction survey) At least annually + at placement closure Survey tool; results in Radius 2INgage Provider Manual Rev.1.2026 §12, p.51
CQI Coordinator / Case Specialist Administer a child/youth & young-adult satisfaction survey ensuring youth voice (consolidates the Aftercare/Transition youth satisfaction surveys); collect caregiver feedback forms At least annually + at discharge/aftercare completion Survey tool; results in Radius 2INgage Provider Manual Rev.1.2026 §12, p.51; Aftercare / Youth Transition
CQI Coordinator Gather stakeholder feedback (DFPS, SSCC, community partners, CPS workers, client team members) and staff feedback; maintain an accessible, anonymous concern/feedback channel; participate in and support the SSCC's own stakeholder satisfaction survey Annually + ongoing Survey / concern channel 2INgage Provider Manual Rev.1.2026 §12, pp.51–52 (anonymous feedback; Consumer Affairs); OCOK Operations Manual Rev.7-1-2025 §4.09 (annual Stakeholder Satisfaction Survey); EMPOWER Provider Manual Rev.1.2026 §12 (satisfaction/feedback)
CQI Coordinator Compile satisfaction results, identify themes, and feed findings into the quarterly PQI review and improvement plans; ensure youth voice informs decisions Quarterly PQI meeting record FC-CQI-01; 2INgage §12

3. Incident & Trend Review (PQI)

Who How When Where Reference
Director of Quality Development Review serious/non-serious incident reports for patterns and trends; compile a quarterly report for the PQI meeting; develop action plans and present to the Executive Director Monthly review → quarterly PQI PQI meeting record Cross-ref FC-SIR-01 §"Quality Assurance (PQI)" (do not duplicate)

4. Internal Audits & Corrective Action / QIP

Who How When Where Reference
CQI Coordinator Conduct internal quality audits (documentation, compliance, TBRI fidelity); prepare for external audits/credentialing Per audit calendar; before monitoring reviews Audit reports in Radius TAC §749.665; T3C Blueprint
CQI Coordinator / Program Director When deficiencies are identified, develop and implement a corrective action plan / Quality Improvement Plan (QIP), including any QIP requested or approved by an SSCC; evaluate effectiveness of the change Within timeframe set by the finding or SSCC QIP document 2INgage Provider Manual Rev.1.2026 §12, pp.49–51 (QIP process)

4a. 2INgage Monitoring & Risk Review

SSCC-2INGAGE — addition start (provider-specific; remove this block if the 2INgage contract ends)

For the 2INgage network, Refuge House participates in 2INgage quarterly desk reviews and an annual on-site joint monitoring (minimum 10% file review), provides any missing documentation within 72 hours, implements a Quality Improvement Plan within 30 days of identified deficiencies, and may submit a written response to disagreements within 5 business days. Risk management is reviewed monthly during 2INgage network data calls, with results reported to agency leadership. (2INgage Provider Manual Rev. 1.2026 §12, pp.48–49; §11, p.47)

SSCC-2INGAGE — addition end

SSCC-EMPOWER — addition start (provider-specific; remove this block if the EMPOWER contract ends)

For the EMPOWER network, Refuge House participates in EMPOWER quarterly desk reviews and annual on-site monitoring (minimum 10% file review; 100% if fewer than five children), provides missing documentation within 72 hours of the exit interview, implements a Quality Improvement Plan within 30 days, and may submit a written response to disagreements within 5 business days (EMPOWER's final response within 10 business days); risk management is reviewed monthly during network data calls (EMPOWER Provider Manual Rev. 1.2026 §12, pp.51–55).

SSCC-EMPOWER — addition end

SSCC-OCOK — addition start (provider-specific; remove this block if the OCOK contract ends)

For the OCOK network, Refuge House participates in OCOK's annual Monitoring Review (announced/unannounced, on-site or desk; at least 24-hour notice, up to 30-day advance notice; a 10% client-file and 10% CPA-personnel sample, 100% if fewer than five), receives the final report within 30 business days of the exit interview, completes any PQI/QIP within 30 days, and may submit a written disagreement within 5 business days (OCOK responds within 10); improvement follows OCOK's DMAIC cycle. Refuge House also participates in OCOK's annual stakeholder/client satisfaction survey (OCOK Network Management Operations Manual Rev. 7-1-2025 §4.03, pp.47–50; §4.04, pp.61–62; §4.09, p.79).

SSCC-OCOK — addition end

SSCC-4KIDS — addition start (provider-specific; remove this block if the 4Kids4Families contract ends)

For the 4Kids4Families network, Refuge House participates in DFPS Community-Based Care evaluation activities and reports quality/performance data at the child level on the SSCC's quarterly cadence (4Kids4Families Subcontractor Agreement Art. XVIII §3, Exhibit D).

SSCC-4KIDS — addition end

SSCC-BELONG — addition start (provider-specific; remove this block if the Belong contract ends)

For the Belong network, Refuge House cooperates with Belong Quality Assurance monitoring — an on-site visit within the first year, annual site visits, and quarterly case reviews of at least 10% of risk-flagged cases, with corrective action where errors persist — and participates in Belong satisfaction surveys of clients, employees, providers, and foster parents (Belong Stage I & II Provider Manual, pp.54–56).

SSCC-BELONG — addition end

5. Reporting

Who How When Where Reference
CQI Coordinator Prepare quarterly quality reports (outcomes by Service Package, satisfaction results, PQI trends, audit/QIP status) for leadership and the Board; report to regulatory/contract bodies as required; maintain audit-ready documentation At least quarterly Leadership / Board / SSCC / DFPS T3C Blueprint; 2INgage §11–§12

QUALITY ASSURANCE:

The CQI Coordinator verifies that each component above occurs on schedule and that the program is reviewed for effectiveness at least annually. Methodology follows a continuous PDSA cycle compatible with the SSCC's monitoring process (e.g., 2INgage "DO-RITE").

REGULATORY ALIGNMENT:

26 TAC §749.665 (Quality Assurance — the agency's CQI Process anchor); T3C System Blueprint (CQI Infrastructure Function #6; per-package Logic Models + CQI Models); 2INgage Provider Manual Rev. 1.2026 §12 (satisfaction surveys, QIP, DO-RITE) and §11 (reporting cadence); OCOK Network Management Operations Manual Rev. 7-1-2025 §4.04 (PQI/DMAIC), §4.09 (annual Stakeholder Satisfaction Survey), §4.05 (Quality Management); EMPOWER Provider Manual Rev. 1.2026 §12 (satisfaction/feedback), §11 (Monthly Case Status Report); cross-ref FC-SIR-01 (PQI engine), FC6-01 (placement-stability monitoring), and the per-package Logic/CQI Models (cookbook/previewforms; data/placement-datasheets.json).

SSCC alignment (FY-26): 2INgage Provider Manual Rev. 1.2026 — §12 (pp.48–49 monitoring); §11 (p.47 monthly risk call). Cross-reference: FC-CQI-01 Continuous Quality Improvement Policy; FY-26 SSCC coverage tracker (temporary-reference/fy26-sscc-joint-monitoring/sscc-alignment/).

SSCC alignment (FY-26) — EMPOWER: EMPOWER Provider Manual Rev. 1.2026 — §12 (pp.51–55 monitoring & monthly risk call). Cross-reference: FC-CQI-01 Continuous Quality Improvement Policy; FY-26 SSCC variance matrix.

SSCC alignment (FY-26) — OCOK: OCOK Network Management Operations Manual Rev. 7-1-2025 — §4.03 (pp.47–50 monitoring); §4.04 (DMAIC); §4.09 (p.79 satisfaction). Cross-reference: FC-CQI-01 Continuous Quality Improvement Policy; FY-26 SSCC variance matrix.

SSCC alignment (FY-26) — 4Kids: 4Kids4Families Joint Operations Manual (Dec 2025) / Subcontractor Agreement — Agreement Art. XVIII §3, Exhibit D (CBC evaluation; quarterly child-level data). Cross-reference: FC-CQI-01 Continuous Quality Improvement Policy; FY-26 SSCC variance matrix.

SSCC alignment (FY-26) — Belong: Belong Stage I & II Provider Manual (Aug 2025) / Provider Services Agreement — pp.54–56 monitoring & satisfaction. Cross-reference: FC-CQI-01 Continuous Quality Improvement Policy; FY-26 SSCC variance matrix.

SSCC alignment (FY-26) — SFCS: SFCS Placement Provider Manual (July 2020, publicly-sourced) — the SFCS requirements for this area (incidents/QI/IT) fall in the manual's truncated back-half; confirm against the current SFCS provider manual before relying on this. No additional provision applied yet. Cross-reference: FC-CQI-01 Continuous Quality Improvement Policy; FY-26 SSCC variance matrix.

FORMS/ATTACHMENTS:


This procedure operationalizes FC-CQI-01 Continuous Quality Improvement Policy and may be updated by the Executive Director to reflect regulatory or operational changes, provided alignment with the policy's intent is maintained.


IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE

Guidance for operationalizing the following enhancement(s), including build-out in Pulse. Recovered from the prior T3C Basic procedure draft (6/2025); align to the T3C Blueprint (April 2026).

IG · T3C service-delivery documentation & QA cadence

Implement a monthly child-progress summary due by the 5th of the following month, and a quarterly QA record review (TBRI® fidelity + compliance) that triggers a Program Director improvement plan within 10 days of the QA report. (Source: recovered T3C Basic procedure draft; align T3C Blueprint CQI, TAC §749.673.)